- HOMEWelcome
- DIRECTORATE FOR EU AFFAIRSStructure
- E.U.Structure
- TÜRKİYE-EU RELATIONS
- History of Türkiye- EU Relations
- Main Documents
- Agreements
- Protocols
- Accession Partnership Documents
- National Programmes for the Adoption of the Acquis (NPAA)
- Türkiye Reports Prepared by the European Commission
- Enlargement Strategy Papers
- Türkiye’s National Action Plan for the EU Accession
- Türkiye’s National Action Plan for the EU Accession (2021-2023)
- Association Council Decisions
- Documents on Türkiye-EU Summits
- Institutional Structure
- Customs Union
- Türkiye- EU High Level Dialogue Meetings
- DATASources
- MEDIANews
- CONTACTContact Us
IMPROVED COURT EXPERT SYSTEM
GENERAL INFORMATION |
|
Project title |
IMPROVED COURT EXPERT SYSTEM |
Priority area |
Justice |
Beneficiary |
Ministry of Justice |
Co-Beneficiary |
|
Duration |
Duration: 29 Months Inception: 25.12.2012 End: 24.06.2015 |
EU contribution (Euro) |
€ 1,500,000 |
|
|
PROJECT SUMMARY |
|
Brief description of the project and main objectives |
The court expert system in Turkey has continuously suffered from many unclear, unresolved and not properly regulated issues, thus causing long proceedings, and consequently affecting adversely the impartiality and confidence in the judiciary. The main problems appear to vary from lack of quality and competence of experts to their appointment process. Since reports of court experts are not standardized, courts usually receive poor quality reports, and therefore they need complementary reports which results in a time- consuming process. There are no written rules on how the service is to be rendered and what qualifications the experts are required to have. In many cases experts provide opinions on legal aspects rather than on technical specificities. Due to their excessive workload, judges tend to frequently resort to the expertise process even when it comes to legal interpretation. The proposed intervention aims to address the above-mentioned issues by preparing a comprehensive study to assess the gaps and needs and by putting forward solutions.
|
Location |
|
Achievements / expected outputs |
Result 1: Overall quality of the expertise services raised and court expert system subjected to concrete standards and ethical rules. Result 2: Awareness raised in high courts, first instance courts and related parties. |