- HOMEWelcome
- DIRECTORATE FOR EU AFFAIRSStructure
- E.U.Structure
- TÜRKİYE-EU RELATIONS
- History of Türkiye- EU Relations
- Main Documents
- Agreements
- Protocols
- Accession Partnership Documents
- National Programmes for the Adoption of the Acquis (NPAA)
- Türkiye Reports Prepared by the European Commission
- Enlargement Strategy Papers
- Türkiye’s National Action Plan for the EU Accession
- Türkiye’s National Action Plan for the EU Accession (2021-2023)
- Association Council Decisions
- Documents on Türkiye-EU Summits
- Institutional Structure
- Customs Union
- Türkiye- EU High Level Dialogue Meetings
- DATASources
- MEDIANews
- CONTACTContact Us
Institution Building on Air Quality in the Marmara Region
GENERAL INFORMATION |
|||
Project title |
Institution Building on Air Quality in the Marmara Region |
||
Priority area |
|
||
Beneficiary |
Environmental Reference Laboratory |
||
Co-Beneficiary |
Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, the Ministry of Health , the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBITAK) |
||
Duration |
47 Months (21/10/2009-30/09/2013) |
||
EU contribution (Euro) |
7.080.000 |
||
|
|
PROJECT SUMMARY |
|
Brief description of the project and main objectives |
The Project is to improve the environmental conditions in Türkiye by implementation and enforcement of the EU environmental acquis in the frame of ambient air quality. Framework conditions are established for efficient, effective and transparent implementation of the AQFD requirements in the Marmara Region which will serve as a model for Türkiye to implement those requirements
|
Location |
The 11 provinces of the Marmara region: Balıkesir, Bilecik, Bursa, Çanakkale,Edirne, İstanbul, Kırklareli, Kocaeli, Sakarya, Tekirdağ, and Yalova |
Achievements / expected outputs |
For the implementation of AQFD and daughter directives in a regional level, Regional Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System were established and operated. For the implementation of the AQFD and daughters directives requirements, the development of the institutional and technical capacity was ensured. Awareness of priority groups and decision makers were raised. |